1 Autumn, relieving myself 2016-09-29 2 OIL 2016-05-03 3 The squrim of North Korea. What will be the result? 2016-03-22 4 Autumn; the season for students 2015-09-30 5 Sinju Singers Big Concert 2015-08-26 6 Economy Shaken by China's decrease 2015-08-24 7 North Korea's serious attack 2015-08-21 8 Humanity, the entrance of the peaceful life 2015-08-19 9 Abe's notorious behaviors 2015-08-14 10 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2015-08-07 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [다음10개]   회 원 현동준 작성일 2014-12-12 Weather    Feeling  As usua 제 목 English 내 용 Both the writer and the speaker discuss the issue on English. While the writer believes that English should be an official global language, the speaker cast doubt on the opinion. Firstly, the author states that when English take place as a global language, it can encourage global peace and reconcile their difference. In contrast, the speaker refutes the claim by maintaining that it will be more conflicts maybe created if the global community is seen to be more preferred English over other languages. She elaborates that some countries may see that to an insult to their country, language, and heritage, so they might start to fight or even a war. Secondly, the writer contends that when English is became global language, it can save people’s money and time on translation works. However, the professor rebuts the claim by stating that it cost government lot of money in the long run. She adds that other less used languages would gradually disappear, but when the government tries to restore languages again, it would require enormous amounts of money. Lastly, the author argues that it will create an easy access to literary works and scientific information if English are spoken by everyone. On the other hand, the speaker opposes the claim by arguing that to truly appreciate cultural works; they have to understand the original language they were written in. She points out that translation is not always successful in preserving literary expressions and gives an example of historical documents by claiming about when they restricting the use of old languages, there must be some people who cut out from work. 답변자 ts0075 답변일 2014-12-16 답변내용 Both the writer and the speaker discuss the issue on English. ◕ Both the writer and the speaker discuss the issue about English. While the writer believes that English should be an official global language, the speaker cast doubt on the opinion. ◕ While the writer believes that English should be an official global language, the speaker cast doubt on the opinion. Firstly, the author states that when English take place as a global language, it can encourage global peace and reconcile their difference. ◕First, the author states that when English takes place as a global language, it can encourage global peace and reconcile their difference. In contrast, the speaker refutes the claim by maintaining that it will be more conflicts maybe created if the global community is seen to be more preferred English over other languages. ◕ In contrast, the speaker refutes the claim by standing for the argument that there will be more conflict that might be created if the global community is seen to prefer English more than the other languages. She elaborates that some countries may see that to an insult to their country, language, and heritage, so they might start to fight or even a war. ◕ She elaborates that some countries may see that as an insult to their country, their language, and their heritagse, so they might start to fight or even have a war. Secondly, the writer contends that when English is became global language, it can save people’s money and time on translation works. ◕ Second, the writer contends that when English became a global language, it can save peoples money and time on translation works. However, the professor rebuts the claim by stating that it cost government lot of money in the long run. ◕ However, the professor rebuts the claim by stating that it can cost the government a lot of money in the long run. She adds that other less used languages would gradually disappear, but when the government tries to restore languages again, it would require enormous amounts of money. ◕ She adds that other less-used languages would gradually disappear, but when the government tries to restore languages again, it would require an enormous amount of money. Lastly, the author argues that it will create an easy access to literary works and scientific information if English are spoken by everyone. ◕ ✔ On the other hand, the speaker opposes the claim by arguing that to truly appreciate cultural works; they have to understand the original language they were written in. ◕On the other hand, the speaker opposes the claim by arguing that to truly appreciate cultural works, they have to understand the original language they were written in. She points out that translation is not always successful in preserving literary expressions and gives an example of historical documents by claiming about when they restricting the use of old languages, there must be some people who cut out from work. ◕ She points out that translation is not always successful in preserving literary expressions, and gives an example of historical documents by claiming that by restricting the use of old languages, there are some people being cut out from work.