:: 외국인 1:1 Free Talking ::

What’s This About?
Most teens don’t get the recommended 8 to 10 hours of sleep, which can affect their health and focus. As awareness of sleep’s importance grows, experts are increasingly calling for later school start times to help students get the sleep they need ? but would that actually improve learning or create new challenges?

Constructive
Pro Peter
Starting school later is a smart, science-backed change that will improve student well-being and academic success. Teens need 8 to 10 hours of sleep, but the current school start times make that nearly impossible. According to the American Academy of Pediatrics, insufficient sleep harms focus, memory, and mental health, thus impacting students’ ability to learn. In light of that, it should come as no surprise to hear that schools that have already shifted to an 8:30 a.m. or later start reported better attendance, higher grades, and improved student mood. Prioritizing student health isn’t something we should be viewing as an inconvenience ? it’s a long-term investment in learning and well-being. By starting later, schools can give students a better chance to succeed both in and out of the classroom.

Con Bella
Though well-intentioned, later start times present serious logistical challenges for families and schools. Many households have early routines, with parents needing to leave for work before or just after school begins. A later start could force working parents to seek additional childcare in the mornings, which can be costly or unavailable. For families with multiple children in different schools, mismatched schedules can complicate drop-offs and pickups, adding stress and time to already busy mornings. Transportation systems would also be strained, especially in districts where buses serve multiple schools in staggered shifts. Delaying school start times can create a domino effect, disrupting the entire district’s schedule. These logistical complications aren’t minor ? they can affect attendance, family income, and even student safety if more teens walk or wait for buses in the dark.

Rebuttal
Pro Peter
Teens aren’t just staying up late by choice ? their biology pushes them to sleep later. During adolescence, their internal clocks shift, making it hard to fall asleep before 11 p.m. and wake up early feeling rested. As a result, early school start times lead to chronic sleep loss. Furthermore, while concerns about family schedules and transportation are valid, they don’t outweigh the clear benefits of better sleep. With thoughtful planning, schools and families can adapt. Districts can adjust bus schedules or explore flexible learning options. Families can coordinate carpools, shift evening activities, and build new morning routines. These changes take effort, but they’re realistic and worth it. When school starts later and matches teens’ natural rhythms, students are more rested, alert, and ready to learn, making school more effective for everyone.

Con Bella
While it’s true that teenagers need sleep, changing school start times isn’t the only ? or best ? solution. The claim that students will automatically sleep more with this change overlooks personal habits and responsibilities. Many teens stay up late due to homework, social media, or part-time jobs, and a later start could shift everything later without increasing total sleep. Also, adjusting transportation, after-school programs, and family routines is costly and disruptive, especially for working parents or younger siblings. Instead of reshaping the entire school day, schools should focus on educating students about healthy sleep habits, managing screen time, and balancing schedules. Personal responsibility and time management are lifelong skills. While later start times may help some, they’re not a universal fix. A more flexible, holistic approach can address teen sleep without overhauling daily life.

Judge’s Comments
The debate over school start times balances teen health with real-world logistics. While biology supports later starts, practical challenges remain. Ultimately, schools must weigh both sides carefully to decide what best supports students’ learning, well-being, and overall success.